Answers
to All Exercises (Hampton & Havel 2005)
Notes:
1)
Textbook has answers only to the
odd-numbered problems.
2)
Rounding errors may cause slight
discrepancies between these answers and your answers.
Chapter
2
2.1
a) ratio b) continuous
2.2 a)
ratio b) continuous
2.3 a) ratio b)
discrete
2.4 ordinal
2.5-2.6 Male
Number 1 2 3 4 5 6
Height 181 202 190 185 190 200
Rank 1 6 3.5 2 3.5 5
Category S T S S S T
2.7-2.8 Pond Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
No.
Bullfrogs 34 65 23 34 18 20 15 70 15 18 34
Rank 8.0 10 6 8.0 3.5 5 1.5 11 1.5 3.5 8.0
Category D D S D S S S D S S D
2.9 a)
continuous measurement, ratio, continuous, derived
b) discrete measurement, ratio, discrete, simple
c) attribute, nominal
d) continuous measurement, ratio, continuous,
transformed
e) continuous measurement, ratio, continuous,
simple
2.10 a) 107
b) 6.82 X 10-2
c) 3.05
d) 7.82 X 103
e) 2.91
f) 20.2
Chapter
4
4.1
Mean 6.0
Median 6.5
Range 1, 11
IQ range 3.0, 9.0
Variance 8.9655
Standard Deviation 2.9942
CV 49.9%
4.2
Mean 30.3846
Median 23.00
Range 12, 56
IQ range 14.5, 43.0
Variance 261.4231
Standard Deviation
16.1686
CV 53.2%
4.3
Mean 55.6976
Median 56.5
Range 47.0, 62.4
IQ range 52.175, 59.225
Variance 18.4310
Standard Deviation 4.2931
CV 7.7%
4.4
Mean 181.8176
4.5
Mean 274.2100
4.8
299 pits in 100 quadrats;
mean = 2.99 pits/quadrat
4.9
Median = 2
Chapter
5
5.1
0.25
5.2
0.25
5.3
0.50
5.4
0.234375
5.5
0.34375
5.6
0.032152
5.7
0.33021
5.8
0.9042
5.9
0.3125
5.10
0.34375
5.11
0.015625
5.12
0.015625
5.13
0.177979
5.15
0.822021
5.16
0.46606
5.17
5.18
273
5.19
3.323 » 3
5.20
a) 0.07179 b) 0.92821
5.21
mean = 2.99 Sf = 100
x p(x) f(x)
0 0.0503 5.03
1 0.1504 15.04
2 0.2248 22.48
3 0.2240 22.40
4 0.1675 16.75
5 0.1001 10.01
6 0.0499 4.99
7 0.0213 2.13
8 0.0080 0.80
5.23
a) 0.007967 b)
0.179336
5.24
µ
= 1.6667 phage/cell; p(0) = 0.1889; p(³1)
= 0.8111
5.25
µ
= 0.6 phage/cell; p (≥3)
= 0.0231
Chapter
6
6.1
0.0021
6.2
0.0455
6.3
0.6331
6.4
23.52 to 45.05
6.5
0.1814
6.6
0.1292
6.7
0.2386
6.8
113.16 to 190.55
6.9
0.0968
6.10
0.0001
6.11
0.3707
6.12
0.0021
6.13
0.8060
6.14
0.9723
Chapter
7
7.1-7.6
[Answers depend on random samples collected]
7.7
90% CI: 6.00 ± 0.93 = 5.07, 6.93
95% CI: 6.00 ± 1.12 = 4.88, 7.12
99% CI: 6.00 ± 1.51 = 4.49, 7.51
7.8
90%; 55.698 ± 1.116
95%; 55.698 ± 1.339
99%; 55.698 ± 1.791
7.9
90%; 19.2556 ± 1.5895
95%; 19.2556 ± 1.9707
99%; 19.2556 ± 2.8672
7.10
90%; 364.2500 ± 56.5054
95%; 364.2500 ± 69.2514
99%; 364.2500 ± 97.7205
7.11
90%; 45.1818 ± 5.4473
95%; 45.1818 ± 6.6967
99%; 45.1818 ± 9.5252
7.12
90%; 35.4000 ± 2.8489
95%; 35.4000 ± 3.4698
99%; 35.4000 ± 4.8159
7.13
90%; 4.9760 ± 0.2877
95%; 4.9760 ± 0.3471
99%; 4.9760 ± 0.4703
7.14
90%; 1934.6429 ± 247.9211
95%; 1934.6429 ± 302.4399
99%; 1934.6429 ± 421.7023
Chapter
8
8.1
H0: µ ≤ 10 ppb vs. Ha: µ > 10 ppb
t
= 2.50, one-tailed p-value: 0.005 < p < 0.01
reject H0, \exceeds 10 ppb
8.2
H0: µ ≥ 50 Ha:
µ < 50
t
= -2.8947; p » 0.005; \ reject H0;
enzyme levels are depressed, suggesting that water is polluted
8.3
H0: µ = 100 Ha:
µ ¹ 100
|t| = 5.367, p < 0.0001, \ reject H0;
mean weight differs from 100;
so this hen should be removed from breeding program
8.4
H0: m ≥ 8.0 vs. Ha:
µ < 8.0
mean = 7.94
t = 1.32, p » 0.10, fail to
reject, \not less than 8.0
8.5
H0: m ³ 425 vs. Ha:
m < 425
t
= 0.78, p > 0.20, fail to reject, \not
less than 425 (ponds not lower than lakes)
8.6
H0: m £ 3.5 vs. Ha:
m > 3.5
t
= 1.58, p-value 0.10 < p < 0.20, \yes,
no evidence of any difference from claim
Chapter
9
9.1
H0: µ(men) = µ(women) vs. Ha: µ(men) ¹ µ(women)
|t| =
3.83, p-value 0.0001 < p < 0.001, reject H0, \genders are
different
95% CI for μw μm
= 8.481 ± 4.437 = 4.044, 12.918
We are 95% sure that the resting pulse rate is between 4.0
and 12.9 beats per minute greater in women than in men.
9.2
H0: µ(men) = µ(women) vs. Ha: µ(men)
¹ µ(women)
|t| = 1.57
9.3
H0: µ(largemouth) = µ(smallmouth) vs. Ha: µ(largemouth) ¹ µ(smallmouth)
|t| = 11.33
9.4
H0: µ(A) ≤ µ(B)
vs. Ha: µ(A) > µ(B)
t
= 0.95
9.5
H0: µ(down) ≤ µ(up) vs. Ha: µ(down)
> µ(up)
t
= 5.14
9.6
H0: µ(exposed) ≥ µ(untreated) vs. Ha: µ(exposed) < µ(untreated)
t
= 5.378
9.7
H0: µ(glucose) = µ(sucrose) vs. Ha: µ(glucose)
¹ µ(sucrose)
t
= 0.731
9.8
H0: µ(treated) ≤ µ(control) vs. Ha: µ(treated) > µ(control)
t
= 2.671
9.9
H0: µ(with) ≤ µ(without) vs. Ha: µ(with)
> µ(without)
t
= 6.1612
9.10
H0: µ(A) = µ(B) vs. Ha: µ(A) ¹ µ(B)
t
= 2.9414
9.11
H0: µ(coniferous) = µ(deciduous) vs. Ha: µ(coniferous)
¹ µ(deciduous)
t
= 4.1210
9.12
H0: µ(athletes) ≥ µ(non)
vs. Ha: µ(athletes) < µ(non)
t
= 2.22
9.13
H0: µ(smokers) ≤ µ(non) vs. Ha: µ(smokers) > µ(non)
t
= 0.67
9.15
H0:
q(hairy) ≤ q(non-hairy)
vs. Ha: q(hairy) > q(non-hairy)
U
= 91.5, Ucrit = 73, p<<0.05, reject H0, \ hairy appear
scarier!
9.16
U
= 31, p < 0.05
9.17
U
= 123.5, p < 0.05
9.18
U
= 45, p < 0.05
9.19
U
= 57, Ucrit = 71, p > 0.05
9.20
H0: µ(post pre) ≤ 0 vs. Ha: µ(post pre) > 0
t
= 10.62, t14, 2, (.05) = 1.761, p < 0.0001, reject H0,
\PHA increases wattle
thickness
9.21
H0: µ(difference) = 0 vs. Ha: µ(difference) ¹ 0
t
= 4.27
9.22
H0: µ(difference) = 0 vs. Ha: µ(difference) ¹ 0
t
= 2.139
9.23
H0: µ(wall center) ≤ 0 vs. Ha: µ(wall center) > 0
t
= 2.3904
9.24
H0:
qdif
= 0 vs. Ha: qdif ¹
0
T
= 2.5, Tcrit = 4 (note: reject is T is lower than Tcrit
), 0.01 < p < 0.05, reject H0
9.25
T
= 0
9.26
k
= 8, p =0.5, P(X ≤
1) = 0.003906 + 0.03125 = 0.035156 (p-value), reject H0
9.27
p
= 0.0625
9.28
p
= 0.109375
9.29
U
= 90.5, p > 0.05
9.30
H0: µ(A) = µ(B) vs. Ha: µ(A)
¹ µ(B)
t
= 0.5547
9.31
H0: µ(difference) = 0 vs. Ha: µ(difference) ¹ 0
t
= 2.94, 0.01 < p < 0.02
9.32
T
= 13.5, T14, .05 = 21, \reject
H0, 0.01 < p < 0.05
9.33
H0: µ(infected) = µ(healthy)
H1: µ(infected) ¹ µ(healthy)
t
= 3.71
Chapter
10
10.1
H0 all µs
equal vs. Ha: one or more µs different
F2,12, (.05) = 3.89, Fstat = 30.87, p <<
0.05, reject H0
Source Sum of Squares df MS F
Between-Groups 6.2713 2 3.1356 30.87
Error 1.2191 12 0.1016
Total 7.4904 14
10.2
Source Sum of Squares df MS F
Between-Groups 0.09695 2 0.0485 89.81
Error 0.00814 15 0.00054
Total 0.1051 17
10.3
Source Sum of Squares df MS F
Between-Groups 632.95 3 210.98 70.33
Error 48.00 16 3.00
Total 680.95 19
10.4
Source Sum of Squares df MS F
Between-Groups 2365.6 4 591.4 21.05
Error 983.5 35 28.1
Total 3349.1 39
10.5
Source Sum of Squares df MS F
Between-Groups 1740.4 2 870.2 79.11
Error 132.0 12 11.0
Total 1872.4 14
10.6
Source Sum of Squares df MS F
Between-Groups 2112.47 2 1256.23 10.95
Error 3097.00 27 114.70
Total 5609.47 29
10.7
Source Sum of Squares df MS F
Between-Groups 3785.65 4 946.41 72.78
Error 455.13 35 13.00
Total 4240.78 39
10.8
Source Sum of Squares df MS F
Between-Groups 45.31 2 22.65 5.81
Error 89.65 23 3.9
Total 134.96 25
10.9
Source Sum of Squares df MS F
Between-Groups 145.6389 3 48.5463 19.64
Error 79.1111 32 2.4722
Total 224.7500 35
10.10
Source Sum of Squares df MS F
Between-Groups 1442.1333 2 721.0667 16.06
Error 538.8000 12 44.9000
Total 1980.9333 14
10.11 10.18
Using MINITAB, homogeneity of variance test suggests
all except 10.17 and 10.18 conform to assumptions of equal variance.
10.19
H0:
all qs equal vs. one or more qs different
H
= 9.39, c2
2, .05 = 5.99, p < 0.01, reject H0.
10.20
H
= 17.98
10.21
H
= 12.42