Vertebrate Survey

Updated 21 January 2005

 

 

Subphylum Vertebrata - survey chordates (2-3 lineages of protochordates)

A.   Cephalochordata (slide 1)

a.      small (1-3”), wormlike, marine, burrowing, sexually dimorphic

b.     all chordate characters; notochord extends entire length; similar circulatory and digestive systems to vertebrates

B.    Urochordata (slide 2)

a.      tunicates (“sea-squirts”), small, marine, brightly colored; larvaceans (planktonic), adults sac-like (sessile filter feeders)

b.     chordate characters in larvae only (metamorphosis); notochord confined to tail region

C.   Hemichordata (problematic) (slide 3)

a.      2 groups; acorn worms (sedentary burrowers), pterobranchs (sessile filter feeders)

b.     no structures homologous to DHNC or notochord

c.     links to both chordates and echinoderms

 

What lineage is the closest living relative of chordates?

-methodology: compare fundamental embryonic development (conservative)

-2 groups coelomates:

 

Deuterostomia

Protostomia

blastopore

Anus

Mouth

Cleavage

Indeterminant

Determinant

 

Radial

Spiral

Skeleton

Mesoderm

Ectoderm

 

Chordates, echinoderms

Most everything else

 

Conclusion? echinoderms closest living relatives (share common ancestor; not ancestral); also similarities in larvae, mesoderm and coelom formation, blood proteins, muscle chemistry

 

________________________________________________        

 

Vertebrate Survey

Vertebrate diversity through geologic time; (slide 4); recent vertebrate species diversity

 

 

Known

1995

Projected

1995

Known

2000

Fishes

20,000

40,000

23,250

Amphibians

4500

6000

4780

Reptiles

6400

7500

7800

Birds

9100

950,000

9702

Mammals

4000

4100

4675

 

Savage, J.M. 1995. Systematics and the biodiversity crisis.

Bioscience 45:673-679.

Uetz, P. 2000. How many reptile species? Herpetological

Review 31:13.

 

 

 

Linnaean Classification of the Vertebrates

 

 

Important!  Remember that Linnaean groupings are determined by man for his convenience; they do not necessarily reflect evolutionary history!

 

 

I. Pisces/Fish (primary aquatic; non-amniote)

 

Superclass Agnatha – jawless vertebrates; *earliest forms were non-mineralized (rare in the fossil record) + 3 major lineages

 

*Conodonta (slide 5)

A.   extremely common; mostly small, some up to 30 cm; no appendages

B.    mineralized feeding apparatus

 

*Ostracoderms (slide 6)

A.   many fossils worldwide (extensive dermal armor); small minnow-sized; no girdles or limbs (paired appendages derived from skin)

B.    2 lineages, relationships poorly known (bottom dwellers, active swimmers)

 

Cyclostomes (slide 7)

A.   Elongate eel-like, median fins, no dermal bone, rasping tongue (no true teeth); 2 lineages

B.    Myxini (hagfish)

1.   Scavenger; mucous glands; single median nostril

2.   Body fluids isotonic with sea water (physiologically like invertebrates)

C.   Petromyzontiformes (lampreys)

1.     vertebrate parasites; ammocoetes larvae (filter feeder)

 

Superclass Gnathostomata - jawed vertebrates

 

Class *Placodermi (“plate skin”); slide 8

A.   Many fossils worldwide (heavily armored); little internal bone; paired girdles and fins, jaws probably resulted in more active lifestyles (cf ostracoderms)

B.    9 lineages (relationships poorly known), arthrodires best known (up to 9m!)

C.   Evolutionary dead end (not closely related to either the cartilaginous or bony fishes that replaced them!)

 

Class Chondrichthyes (“cartilagenous fishes”); slide 9

A.   Subclass Elasmobranchii (“plate gill”) separate gill openings (no operculum)

1.     No internal bone, reduced external bone (placoid scales); pelvic claspers

2.     Teeth derived from scales (many fossils of shark teeth, but little else)

3.     Large livers with buoyant oils; spiracle (reduced 1st gill slit)

4.     Not primitive (younger than bony fish)

5.     4 lineages; sharks (active predators), up to 20m; rays (bottom dwellers, mollusks, large pectoral fins)

B.    Subclass Holocephali

1.     Chimaeras (ratfish – tail)

2.     Large head, colorful, no scales, operculum

3.     Broad crushing teeth

 

Class *Acanthodii (“spiny forms”); slide 10

A.   Common, mostly small (minnow-sized, some up to 2 m)

B.    Up to 5 pair fins supported by spines

C.   No enamel on teeth; reduced dermal armor

 

Class Osteichthyes (“bony fishes”)

Highly ossified internal skeleton, reduced external bone (thin bony scales), pectoral girdle connected to skull, swim bladder (in many)

A.   Subclass Actinopterygii (“ray finned fishes”)

1.     Superorder Palaeonisciformes (slide 11)

a.      ganoine (form of enamel) in scales

b.     3 lineages; recent Polypterus (obligate air breather), sturgeon (to 8m; roe) and paddlefish (plankton feeders); relicts of an early radiation

2.     Superorder Neopterygii

a.      Lepisosteiforms (gars) ganoine; relict of an early radiation; slide 11

b.     Amiiformes (bowfin) ganoine; relict of an early radiation; slide 11

c.     Teleostei (higher bony fishes)

1)     highly ossified (especially vertebrae); increased jaw mobility; very thin bony scales (no ganoine)

2)     symetrical homocercal tail (cf heterocercal of many earlier fishes) + swim bladder

3)     >40 recent orders (still radiating; most successful recent vertebrates); diverse (slide 12)         

4)     trends (primitive®advanced teleosts); cf trout and bass

a)     pelvic girdle moves forward

b)    greater ossification

c)     swim bladder loses connection with gut

d)    fin ray number reduced  

e)     increased jaw mobility and protrusion: jaws shorten, maxilla excluded from gape, lose teeth, premaxilla independently mobile (slide 13)

 

B.    Subclass Sarcopterygii (“fleshly finned fishes”)

1.     Superorder Crossopterygii (“lobefins”); slide 14

a.      not very diverse; important because one lineage (*Rhipidistia) is thought to be ancestral to tetrapods