Assessment Plan

MAT 605

Plan Writer __________________________________________................. Plan Evaluator ______________________________ Score _____/50

Criteria (weight)	Advanced (4)	Proficient (3)	Basic (2)	Below Basic (1)
Paper(1) /4	Contains: Writer’s name Subject Grade level specifically defined Arranged in logical order Rationale Scoring procedures/rubrics Typed neatly & double spaced	Typed – double spaced or missing a content criteria	Missing two or three advanced criteria	Turned in a paper
Philosophy(1) /4	Explains why this assessment plan is appropriate It is in line with current thinking about assessment The plan is consistent with the philosophy	The intended application is not clear.	It does not match the plan or current thinking.	Has section labeled philosophy
Traditional assessment (3) /12	*Has paper and pencil assessments *Assessments should assess the student’s progress Adequate number of assessments Involves some higher order thinking skills Rationale is reasonable	Missing an advanced criteria	Missing two or three advanced criteria	Includes traditional assessment
Alternative Assessment (4) /16	*Has a variety of alternative assessments *The variety of assessments involve different learning styles Alternative assessments are appropriate to content Alternative assessments are appropriate to students One alternative assessment is present that is: Appropriate to content and students Ready to use	Missing an advanced criteria	Missing two or three advanced criteria	Includes a description of alternative assessment
Evaluation (3) /12	Explains a method at arriving at an official grade The method is appropriate for the students The rationale that explains the weight given to the different assessments is reasonable The plan is defensible (to administration, parents, etc.)	Missing an advanced criteria	Missing two or three advanced criteria	Explains how an official grade is determined

/48 Score = sum of categories + 2